Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1381

reference
130-tree-1
name
1381
tree-preservation-order

undefined

130-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.032701 50.865252)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.032630 50.865245,-1.032633 50.865258,-1.032643 50.865271,-1.032659 50.865281,-1.032678 50.865288,-1.032700 50.865290,-1.032722 50.865288,-1.032742 50.865282,-1.032758 50.865272,-1.032768 50.865260,-1.032772 50.865246,-1.032769 50.865232,-1.032759 50.865219,-1.032744 50.865209,-1.032724 50.865203,-1.032702 50.865200,-1.032680 50.865202,-1.032660 50.865208,-1.032644 50.865218,-1.032634 50.865231,-1.032630 50.865245)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL